Home Blog Page 7

OPPOSE PA SB831

0

Call your senator. Educate your Representatives. Oppose SB831. We are FOR energy independence, the Keystone pipeline, and domestic drilling, but there is a devil in the details here. There is a lot of money in the infrastructure bill being used to get this going. It seeks to put pipelines under PA FARMLAND which can render farmland useless. If a pipeline ruptures, it is very hazardous to human and animal life. Stop Pennsylvania from ruining our state. CO2 makes our environment green.

SCALE Act

Beyond this, Congress is putting bills through which cripple us with regulations, while China and other countries pollute at much higher levels. And China will continue to develop and compete without these self-imposed limitations. Call your senators and tell them to vote to stop the madness.


Appreciate what you’re reading? Be sure to share it!

Have a story? Break it at LibertyLens.News! Become a Contributor.

To Support The Liberty Lens, Donate here.

Marxists Despise Masculinity

America is facing crisis of masculinity. Leftists/Marxists are trying to drive masculine people from the culture. Male and female aren’t synonymous with masculinity and femininity. Male and female, sex, is what the body is, biologically speaking. Male or female, as determined by DNA, doesn’t change. Masculinity and femininity are choices to live and think a certain way. Male and female are physical qualities; masculinity and femininity are cultural and spiritual qualities.

Males and females display both masculine and feminine qualities. Everyone at times displays both masculine and feminine traits. Masculine traits are more analytical, protective, and logical; feminine traits are more emotional, nurturing, and creative. There is an appropriate time for both, depending on the situation. Your six-year-old son breaks his arm; it’s not time to tell him to “Man up.” He needs nurture from Dad and Mom. Thinking isn’t better than feeling, and feeling isn’t better than thinking. But Marxists and Leftists don’t want masculinity in the culture.

Broadly speaking, America is comprised of Thinkers (left-brain dominant people who are more analytical, logical, and masculine) and Feelers (who are right-brain dominant people who are more emotional, creative, nurturing, and feminine). Females tend to be “Feelers” while the majority of males are “Thinkers”. Most mathematicians, engineers, scientists, plumbers, and accountants are male. Most elementary school teachers and nurses are women. Again, both think and feel. This is more a distinction about what plays the greater role in behavior and decision-making.

Masculine/Thinkers/Conservatives, male and female, are objective. They make decisions based on facts. They’re ruled by their head, not their heart. Thinkers judge situations and others based on logic and reason. They value truth over political correctness and easily identify defects. They’re problem solvers who follow the scientific method and use critical thinking—deep thinking that gets to the root cause of a problem. Thinkers make decisions based on what’s right, on objective criteria, and on general – often biblical and legal – principles. “Thinker” doesn’t mean a person is without emotion; it’s a matter of degree. Thinking dominates their feelings.

There is perverse masculinity that results in abuse, assault, rape, gang violence, criminality, and sexual conquests. This is how many Leftists characterize all masculine men.

Feminine/Feelers/Marxists, male and female, are subjective. They make decisions based on feelings. They are ruled by their emotions, not logic and reason. Feelers judge situations and others based on their feelings. They seek first and foremost to please others, and want to be appreciated and listened to. Feelers prioritize harmony and empathy. “Feeler” doesn’t mean a person doesn’t think. Again, it’s a matter of degree. Feelings dominate the behavior and decision-making process.

There’s extreme, perverse, feminine thinking, too. It’s best described as childishness. The childish take emotions and fear beyond a reasonable level. They tend to be steeped in bitterness/anger and are easily offended. They have tantrums and sometimes scream at the sky (this picture will live in infamy). Their greatest joy would appear to be taking offense (see Joe Biden and Greta Thunberg, shills for global Marxism). Childish fears of losing power causes them to bully others into submitting to their desires. They have convinced themselves that this loss of power would be “awful” and “worse than death”. This is perverted femininity masquerading as masculinity; like Jezebel hoping to intimidate and silence masculine conservatives to prevent them from influencing the culture.

Thinkers and Feelers bring a worldview; a perspective though which you interpret the world. It’s a philosophy; a set of beliefs that determine thoughts and actions. It influences the way  we understand the culture and our place in it.  Your worldview is the foundation upon which you make decisions that shape your life. A worldview sees life through a prism. Right-brain dominant people primarily have a feeling worldview prism, and secondarily have a thinking worldview. Left-brain dominant people primarily have a thinking worldview prism, and secondarily have a feeling worldview. Everyone is oriented, to a varying degree, in one of these ways.

Thinking and feeling worldviews are archetypes— broad generalizations of things, like Mother and Father. The archetypal feminine Mother is something everyone in every culture recognizes because of certain qualities she has—nurturing, talkative, cautious, creative, and emotional. The feeling archetype talks to fix problems. “If we talk to terrorists, they’ll stop.” The Dad masculine stereotype is courageous, a risk-taker, quiet, logical, and a provider. The inclination to take risks is why men, on average, earn more than women. Jobs with high risk tend to pay more, and men do most of that kind of work. Men also aren’t as hesitant to negotiate better pay as are women. Unequal pay for men and women has less to do with biological sex and more to do with personal choices and preferences.

Covid-19 responses were left-brain/right brain. Out of fear, right-brainers quickly surrendered their rights, wore six masks (even driving alone in their car), got multiple untested jabs, stayed home, and cancelled Thanksgiving and Christmas with extended family. The childish ones silenced anyone who disagreed with their hysteria. Feeling-dominant people said, “It’s too dangerous to go back to work until we get a vaccine.” Feeling-dominant governors agreed and shut down their states. Leftists were upset last week that In and Out Burger won’t allow their employees to wear masks without a doctor’s order. However, thinking-dominant people said, “We can’t relinquish our rights for Covid, so let us get back to work.” Thinking-dominant governors agreed and kept their states open. Left-brainers refused the jab because there wasn’t enough objective evidence to support its safety or objected because it was tested on aborted baby cell lines. Left-brainers balked at wearing a mask or being told to go one way in a grocery aisle. They celebrated all holidays with anyone they wished.

Leftists/Marxists complain about “Toxic masculinity;” but that’s just a veiled complaint against courageous people who won’t bow to them. Marxists despise masculine people. Kyle Rittenhouse, Michael Flynn, Matt Gaetz, Steve Bannon, Peter Navarro, Roger Stone, Tucker Carlson, and Mark Houck are all courageous, masculine men who dared to opposed childish people running the deep administrative state swamp and paid the price. Even worse for Flynn, Bannon, Navarro, and Stone was they worked for Donald Trump, the ultimate masculine evil. Democrat RFK, Jr., testified before a House Subcommittee last week. Ironically, his fellow Democrats tried to censor him from speaking about censorship, calling him racist and an anti-Semite for the crime of not towing the childish, Democrat-party line. However, childish people like Joe and Hunter Biden and the Clinton’s are allowed to do any criminal activity they want.

The basic differences between distorted and proper masculinity and femininity can be described as 1) “fairness” vs justice (manipulated outcomes vs uniform application); 2) equity vs. equality (equal outcomes vs equal opportunity); and 3) fear vs courage (state that is desired by the Marxism vs. state that is required by Conservativism). The distorted feminine view is childish, and wants every outcome to be equal. In fact “equal outcomes” is essentially their definition of fairness. This is why, for them, the notion that “everyone gets a trophy” is virtuous. (We should have known that, once this got started, it wouldn’t end well). If Marxists can’t emasculate people, they seek to control them. A few cases in point: They couple equity with diversity and inclusion, or DIE. Each term, when unpacked, is yet again distorted. Their debilitating fear leads them to avoid risk, even if the byproduct of that fear is actually a more systemic danger. This is particularly evident in their irrational fear of guns.

Proper masculinity values a form of justice that is blind and uniformly applied. This is an element of the “protector” construct. It also promotes personal responsibility for outcomes and embraces an objective framework for determining what is right. Men and women alike, in this way, contend for the masculine virtues of justice, equality, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness! Anti-masculine Leftists are jettisoning masculinity and biological male and female from our culture. These very good traits have come to be regarded by Marxists as “toxic”. Democrats, the media, and the likes of Bud Light and Target – with their ESG/CEI scores, have been leading the way. Leftists got CMT to pull masculine Jason Aldean’s masculine song, “Try that in a Small Town,” and it went to #1 on the charts. Transgender teaching in the military could be hurting recruitment, which is down 25%.

Leftists redefine terms about biology and perversion. The Biden administration prefers “birthing persons” instead of mothers. Leftists tout “gender affirming care,” which is actually child sexual mutilation, and schools promote it. Pedophiles? NO—they’re just “minor-attracted people,” or “kid touchers.” That’s one reason some Leftists attack the anti-child-sex-trafficking movie, “Sound of Freedom”—it exposes pedophilia. ”Marriage is no longer between a male and female, but between “two people who love each other.” Marxists accuse masculine people of being homophobic, misogynistic and of course racist, but no one seems to know what those terms mean any more, as they have become so universally mis-used. Ironically, if the term “racist” were ever to be properly applied today, it would consistently describe the Left. Stay tuned for Part 2…


Appreciate what you’re reading? Be sure to share it!

Have a story? Break it at LibertyLens.News! Become a Contributor.

To Support The Liberty Lens, Donate here.

Silence of Government: You’re Being Poisoned by Your Food

As I rummage through the now restocked grocery store shelves (partially restocked that is), I notice something. Lots of people are also in the store, and many of them don’t look very healthy. In fact, some of them look downright sick. Trained in some traditional Chinese medicine, I see the glare of deep rooted disease in almost every person from young to old. As people go about picking their favorite chemically concocted cereal or fully processed and preserved nitrate laden meat, most people do not stop to think what they are doing to their bodies.

The average American cannot pronounce half the ingredients listed in your standard American diet. Yet those ingredients are supposedly safe for consumption. What is remarkable is that we have been warned. Concerned citizens, doctors, and scientists alike have been sounding the alarm since the inception of chemicals, medical prophylactic interventions, and farming practices that have been changed in tandem with our system of education. And we all know our education system is more and more suspect each day, but I digress. It seems that much of our nutritional evaluation of packaged and processed food is fabricated like that of socialism (read “The Fabian Society” for more information). In the name of “science”, we are destroying our planet which in turn is destroying our food supply which in turn is destroying our bodies and minds. Sadly, much of our “progress” is deeply rooted in scientific fraud that undermines all logic.

Before waking up to the nonsense of the world, I once survived on fast food and cola. My twenties looked dismal compared to my forties. It took me years to un-do the lifestyle of convenience and yet, when I look at my blood under the microscope, I see very apparent signs of un-aging. If you are an average forty-year-old, you have consumed more than 40,000 meals in your lifetime. How many of those meals have provided nourishment to your cells necessary for replenishment, reproduction, and regeneration? If a good portion of your diet consists of boxed, canned, and/or ready made food, proper nourishment of your cells isn’t happening. We have “microwaved” and “convenienced” ourselves into the oblivion of disease. Are you sick and tired of feeling sick and tired?

There are people walking around with nerve damage simply from eating processed foods. Pause here. If they simply ate clean, whole foods; their lives would change. Of course, it’s not so easy. There is a system in place that is working against them. It is a power hungry, money hungry criminal called government. I won’t blame it on corporations because our government has every opportunity to put the brakes on mega corporations, pharmaceutical companies, and food producers, and they have chosen not to do so. According to the FDA, adverse reactions to prescription drugs cause 100,000 deaths per year. This makes it the 4th leading cause of death. That is over five times the number of deaths from heroin, yet the problem is ignored in our country. Our government, in theory, is designed to protect us; instead they have thrown us to the wolves and are still barreling down that road.

Let me guide you through a winding road of governmental and scientific failures that makes it hard for you to get up in the morning and go about your day. Have you actually read the ingredient lists on the food packages you buy? You’ll see things like sugar, fructose, sucralose, corn syrup, maltodextrin, and other forms of sugar that can come from a variety of sources. It is hard to find a prepackaged food without sugar. Not only is it a staple, it is increasing in amounts by the year. In 1917s, the average person consumed 17.5 pounds of sugar a year, today, it is over 70 pounds, over 100 if you are an American teen. To quote the U.S. Department of Agriculture, “In 1822, the average American ate in 5 days the amount of sugar found in one of today’s 12-ounce sodas. Now, we eat that much every 7 hours!” Here is the thing that most people are unaware of; 1 molecule of sugar uses up 56 molecules of magnesium. Magnesium is responsible for over 300 enzymatic functions in your body. For example, magnesium helps to ensure that calcium goes to your bones rather than your tissues or organs. This, in turn, helps prevent hardened arteries. Essentially this happens because magnesium assists in the activation of vitamin D. This will help regulate calcium and phosphate homeostasis which will influence the growth and maintenance of bones. It may help you have regular bowel movements and feel calmer in stressful situations. But the game changer is gene maintenance: a means of helping to create and repair DNA and RNA. Put simply, it helps to regulate muscle and nerve function, blood sugar levels, blood pressure and making protein, bone, and DNA.

The artificial sweeteners that we were told were the answer to obesity are no better. When you eat an artificial sweetener, anything you put into your body for the next 2 and half hours will turn to fat. This cannot be ignored. According to the CDC, 41.9% of the American population is obese, and this number is trending upward. Sugar and artificial sweeteners are not entirely to blame.

Since World War II, the food production process has changed drastically, particularly with the introduction of widespread use of herbicides and pesticides. Glyphosate is widely used both as an herbicide at the beginning, during planting (to kill weeds), and at the end before the harvest (to dry out the crop for a faster harvest). Want to learn more about glyphosate? Check out Stephanie Seneff, PhD and her research out of MIT. Look her up; it is worth it. Also note, there are currently multiple lawsuits against Monsanto, the creator of glyphosate. Lesser known, but wider used herbicide atrazine is no better. Some 80 million pounds are applied annually in the United States on corn and sorghum to control weeds and increase crop yield, but such widespread use also makes atrazine the most common herbicide contaminant of ground and surface water. Research is showing that this herbicide interferes with endocrine hormones, such as estrogen and testosterone. It changes male frogs into female frogs. A study demonstrated this by putting lower than accepted exposure levels (thank you, EPA) in a tank with frogs. Out of 40 male frogs, 30 were castrated by the chemical, 4 turned into females and produced fertile eggs. Perhaps there is a correlation between that and the drop in testosterone we are seeing in our male population or even the escalating and increasingly concerning gender confusion we are seeing? While I certainly can’t answer that question, it does make one wonder.

Avoiding wheat is not just about an allergy. Have you ever wondered how the flour you cook with gets so white? There is a chemical called Alloxan that is used in science research to destroy the beta cells on the pancreas of test animals to create diabetes in order to understand diabetes better. It seems legit. After all, it is in the name of science. This is where it gets really interesting. When making bleached flour, chlorine gas is used to whiten, disinfect, and break down protein structures to improve baking qualities.  Its a way to quickly generate the baking qualities that would take natural aging several months to accomplish. The chlorine gas and various oxides of chloride are believed to combine with xantophylls in flour, producing alloxan – the very thing used to induce diabetes.  If its killing the beta cells in animals, why would it be any different in the human body?

These chemicals, products and processes are just a few examples. The list could go on and on. So what can we do? Look for ingredients that are simple with names you can pronounce; i.e., organic flour. If it has anything added or taken away, walk away. Stop letting convenience get in the way of feeling well. Also, take a moment to visualize the future and ask yourself this question – how would you prefer to see yourself at the age of 80? Would you prefer life in a wheel chair, hoping a grandchild (or even worse, a nameless stranger clocking in and out of your nursing home) cares for you? Or would you rather see yourself upright, active, enjoying your life and chasing after those grandchildren? The choice is yours. We have the ability to change the food options we buy and eat with or without our government. If you stop buying bad food, better options will become available because manufacturers will invest where they see an opportunity for returns. Individually, if you invest in your health, the returns are even greater! We can do this. And we don’t need the government!


Appreciate what you’re reading? Be sure to share it!

Have a story? Break it at LibertyLens.News! Become a Contributor.

To Support The Liberty Lens, Donate here.

Russian Roulette – Part 2: GOP Puts 5 Rounds In & Begins to Squeeze Trigger

Earlier this week, I posted an article, Russian Roulette – The Death Of The PA Republican Party By Its Own Hand which, beyond garnering a lot of supportive response, has resulted in a lot of current and former county and state Republican committee people reaching out to me with additional information regarding the outright assault on Republicans by our own Party here in Pennsylvania.

It was truly disheartening to hear how so many of our own people, over the past four or so years, have been treated by the Party, mainly at the local/county level. Quite honestly, I was completely floored by some of the malicious actions taken by county GOPs and my own naivete as to their occurrence. I am the first to admit that prior to my campaign for Commonwealth Court, I was unaware of “state committee” or the outright dysfunction of many county GOPs. While I always voted, the inner workings of the Party wasn’t in my sphere and that all changed quickly – and unfortunately, not for the better – once I announced my candidacy and even more so, when I decided to run as an unendorsed candidate. Little did I know that I was about to run head on into the “dirty politics” that everyone talks about, but that few talk about in relation to the actions being taken against them by their own Party and even fewer talk about in relation to judicial campaigns. But here I am, no longer naive to it, recognizing that death is on the doorstep of the Pennsylvania Republican Party and trying my hardest to get the Party to set the gun down, after it has loaded the revolver with 5 rounds and just spun the cylinder.

Since publishing my prior article, I’ve come to learn that this is not merely an issue in Chester, Cumberland, and Montgomery counties. I’ve now come to learn that similar actions (and some even more horrendous in nature) have been taken in Armstrong, Bucks, Northampton, Washington, Westmoreland and the list goes on…It is truly a systemic problem – a cancer – within our Party that will result in the end of the Party in Pennsylvania. But perhaps there is still time – still time to get the Party to remove its finger from the trigger and set down the revolver.

Today, a phenomenal letter was posted by the Pennsylvania Patriot Coalition, which is “comprised of over one hundred Patriot groups across the state.”

The letter eloquently and accurately reviews the history of the “direct primary system,” including that in addition to Crawford, PA being its birthplace, it was devised and implemented as a “result of numerous members of the [] Party feeling disenfranchised by the convention nomination/endorsement process” and the need, for the survival of the Party, to find a process by which everyone’s voice would be heard and given equal weight. And “[s]ince that time, we have understood that the robust discussion and debate that takes place during the primary process is absolutely necessary for party unity and success” because, “[o]nly when Party members know that they have had a chance to participate and speak freely can they ultimately unite around the eventual nominee.” But, “[u]nfortunately, in recent years, we have seen growing fissures in our Party, as member seem to have forgotten the underlying purpose of the direct primary system. We have seen elected Republican chairpersons and committeepersons at the state and county levels, who have pledged not to support our Party’s presidential and gubernatorial candidates in the General election, even though they we

re successful in the Primary. And what action was taken, even though such is directly

contrary to the Pa Republican State bylaws? Nothing. But when several committeepersons elect to support an unendorsed Republican candidate in the Primary, we now have those same chairpersons and committeepersons, who did not honor their pledge to support the Republican candidates in the General, seeking to remove these committeepersons from their duly elected positions, simply because they support a different Republican candidate.”

As the letter further details, numerous members and group are talking about boycotting the upcoming and future elections, if committee persons are removed for their support of unendorsed Republican candidates in the past Primary, with many of them echoing the mantra “if they don’t want us, then they don’t need us” in relation to future elections.

The letter closes imploring Chairman Tabas to take action – “bring our Party together” by sending a letter to “all state, county, and local Republican chairpersons and committeepersons informing them that no committeeperson shall be threatened, harassed, or removed for his/her support of a particular Republican candidate in a Primary, regardless of endorsed status as it is imperative that all of our members have their voice heard and be given an equal say.” And the last sentence says it all – “The future of our Party depends on us allowing our members an unfettered voice in the Primary and having a unified voice in the General.”

So, there is hope – hope that the Party will take its finger off the trigger and put down the revolver. But will it? That is something that only time will tell but it won’t happen unless Chairman Tabas takes action. He has the power and charisma to bring everyone to the table, end these witch hunts, and unify the Party. But will he? For the sake of our Party and the Republic, I hope he will and consistent with my prior letter to him, I beg him to take action, because if he doesn’t, the future is bleak, extremely bleak for conservative values in Pennsylvania and I doubt our Republic will survive.

Trans-America, Part 1: Origins – The David Reimer Tragedy

I was first exposed to the transgender ideology around 2019. It was a radio interview with Dr. Lisa Littman.  Her research focused on the “rapid onset of gender dysphoria” as experienced by the parents of the adolescents.  She developed 3 hypotheses to explain the trans phenomenon:

  • Social media influences resulting in social and peer contagion
  • Parental conflicts
  • Maladaptive coping mechanisms

The desire to change one’s biology seemed a novel notion, but Littman’s motivational hypotheses are familiar and understandable in adolescents.

Every cell in our body has an XX or XY chromosome pair.  You can change your hair, wear the other gender’s clothing, makeup and jewelry, etc., but it’s still the same body in there. But one can’t change one’s body gender, right?  If the motivation were sexual attraction, there is no need these days to hide that or disguise yourself – homosexuality isn’t exactly frowned on these days.

However, this is not the idea behind today’s “transgenderism”.  Today’s focus is on prepubescents, and chemical and surgical changes to the body. Beyond this, it asserts that children have the maturity and the right to make the monumental decision to perform an irreversible, expensive, and painful gender transformation.  What’s worse is that it is not regarded as gender dysphoria, and parents and guardians are told they must affirm the child’s decision to change their gender.

Dr. John Money

The theory of transgenderism was conceived by Dr. John Money, a professor at Johns Hopkins University in the 1960s where he worked with hermaphrodites.  Money was a troubled person.  He was uncomfortable with his masculinity and genitalia due to an impression of masculinity formed from experience with his alcoholic, violent father.  His condition is, properly, diagnosed to as “gender dysphoria”.

In the 1960s and 1970s, feminism asserted that females and males were equal in every respect, and women ought to be permitted to do everything that men do.  This played out in a new title (Ms.), sexual adventurism, equal wage/salary demands, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, and expansion of women’s sports.  It moved on to having women become fighter pilots and infantrymen, and celebrations of ‘firsts’ across  industry C-Suites, and in elected office and political appointments.

There was a great deal of public discourse regarding “nature vs. nurture”.  The “spirit of the age” declared that the predominant factor was “nurture”, and, by extension, that everyone should be able to become anything. When John Money began reporting on his experiment which was to prove his contention that “a boy could be raised as a girl if you started early enough in the boy’s life”, the academic world was ready to believe that it could be done.

Bruce/Brenda/David Reimer’s Tragedy

John Colapinto’s acclaimed book As Nature Made Him: The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl tells this story in detail.  Brian and Bruce Reimer were identical twins born to a Canadian family in 1965.  At 8 months of age, they were taken to be circumcised and malfunction burnt Bruce’s penis beyond recognition. The Reimers saw Dr. Money on TV explaining that “a boy who has normal chromosomes, XY chromosomes, who’s born with normal genitalia, could conceivably be raised as a girl”.  In hope of retrieving his potential, they arranged a consultation with Money in 1967.

This was the perfect circumstance to test Money’s theory – identical twins with identical genetic endowments, an identical prenatal environment, and both raised in the same environment.  He convinced the Reimers to have Bruce castrated (testicles and penis removed) and elementary female external genitalia constructed, and an estrogen injection regimen administered.  He was to be renamed Brenda, given a female hairstyle, clothing, toys, and introduced to everyone as a girl.

“The family would travel see John Money once a year. During those visits, Money would meet with the twins individually. The twins were very uncomfortable in John Money’s presence, because he was abusing them sexually by forcing them to undress, to get naked, and to act out different sexual positions…They were afraid to tell their parents.  The parents had no idea this was going on. Eventually, the twins refused to go anymore.”  The family stopped the visits to Money when the boys were about 10 years old.

During this time, Money reported in academic literature on the progress of his unique experiment.  He reported that “the twins were doing great, and Brenda was adjusting beautifully, that she never questioned anything about her identity, and that she was very feminine.  She fit in with the rest of the girls. She was doing well at school and at home.” Around the time that the twins refused to see him again, 1977, Money published a large report about how well Brenda was doing.  He received a great deal of attention from both professional and lay press. He had proven that his gender theory was correct.  He had proven that whether you’re male or female, all boils down to the environment that you’re raised in.

Money made these “scientific conclusions” regarding children who had not yet experienced puberty.  He wrote no more about his experiment with the twins, but Money received awards for the experiment, continuous funding from the NIH for 25 years, and his ideas were institutionalized and immediately adopted throughout the fields of medicine, mental health, psychiatry, education, sociology, child rearing, and feminism.

However, Money’s claims about Brenda were fabricated.  It was a hoax.

“In 1999, at age 34, Brenda came out and started to speak about what had really happened.  He had not adjusted to a female identity.  He was always very masculine and aggressive.  (Note: testosterone is not only generated by the testes, also in the adrenal glands in a male’s body). His mannerisms and walk were distinctly masculine. He didn’t want to wear dresses and ripped them off. He wanted rough and tumble play, wanted to pee standing up, and wanted to watch how his father shaved. ‘Brenda’ beat up kids for beating up his brother.”

After halting the visits to John Money, the boys entering puberty, and Brenda realizing that he was attracted to girls, the Reimers took the twins to a psychiatrist and psychologist.  urged them to tell the boys what had happened.  “At that moment, Brenda felt a huge sense of relief to know that he was not crazy. He took the name “David”, as he identified with David fighting Goliath.  They stopped (David’s) estrogen treatments, he had restorative medical and surgical treatments, and he was put on male hormone therapy.  David married a woman and became an adoptive father to three children.”

Sadly, there was not a happy ending for the Reimers.  Brian became a drug addict and overdosed.  David committed suicide in 2004.

Money’s theory of flexible genders was not proven after all.  It was, in fact, directly disproven. The methodology of his experiment was fundamentally flawed: one cannot ascertain success with so short a longitudinal observation – just 10 years of age – and with a sample size of one. His reports of Brenda’s adapting to “nurture” were outright lies.

Despite David Reimer’s testimony of how Money’s gender transformation experiment had utterly failed, the academic world, the medical world, and the general public, were off and running to put Money’s conclusions into practice on a massive scale.

But that’s a story for another time.


Documentary videos about John Money and the Reimers

The Story of David Reimer: A Transgender Experiment” (YouTube – Horror Stories)

“David Remer’s Final Public Interview | Dr Money Documentary Ending Clip” (YouTube – Final Interview)

The Origin of Transgender Surgery: John Money and David Reimer” (YouTube – Lila Rose)

The Monster Behind Gender Theory, and the Atrocious Lie He Based It On” (YouTube – Jordan B Peterson)


Appreciate what you’re reading? Be sure to share it!

Have a story? Break it at LibertyLens.News! Become a Contributor.

To Support The Liberty Lens, Donate here.

Russian Roulette: Death of the PA GOP by Its Own Hand

It truly pains me to write this article but it is a necessary evil, if there is any chance of the Republican Party surviving in Pennsylvania.

Two months ago, I had pretty much made up my mind to write a lengthy article about my experience running for the Commonwealth Court and even signaled this in my Campaign’s Faceboook post, stating that in the upcoming days/weeks that I would post “some additional thoughts and insights” regarding the campaign. At the time, my intent was to inform voters about the horrific ways some within the Party treat our candidates, including my own experiences, which included false and malicious statements by (1) a state committeeperson, immediately preceding a vote – so I wouldn’t be made aware of the false allegation until after the vote and thus unable to correct it – that I allegedly falsified an endorsement of a sheriff and (2) the Dauphin County State Committee Chair alleging that I contended I was endorsed by a sitting Justice, who was not up for election (which is ethically impermissible), when I never did anything of the sort. And these examples were just the tip of the iceberg of the dirty politics played by some in the Republican Party in the May Primary judicial races and quite honestly, the “lengthy article” would probably be better described as a book…

But, I decided not to publish the article, because I realized that we, as a Party, were headed into an extremely important election cycle with four major appellate court vacancies on the ballot, including one for the Supreme Court. I recognized that as much as I wanted for people to truly know what occurs – as I, prior to this experience, would have never imagined such would occur, especially in judicial elections – it would only be divisive and result in less likelihood of success for our judicial candidates. And thus, I didn’t for the sake of the Party.

But, unlike myself, others within the Party don’t feel the same. Some believe more divisiveness, the better, because they believe it consolidates their (dwindling) power by removing those who don’t fall in lockstep with their views. Instead of unifying the Party post-Primary, in Chester, Montgomery, and Cumberland Counties, they want to remove duly elected committeepersons because they supported Republican candidates in the Primary that weren’t anointed…err, endorsed. And of course, beyond such action being directly contrary to the State Committee Bylaws (and resultantly, contrary to the law in Pennsylvania), the outlandishly hypocritical nature of these actions are on full display, when one looks to the last November election and whether and to what degree these county chairs supported our Party’s gubernatorial and other candidates. But that isn’t even the most obscene. In Cumberland County, the committeepeople for three consecutive years have refused to adopt a bylaw provision that would allow for removal in such a situation and yet, the chair is moving forward with removal of committeepeople anyway in the absence of such authority…

As a result of my recent campaign and people knowing what I stand for, numerous individuals and groups reached out to me upon learning of these actions and explaining that if these County GOPs move forward with removal of the committeepeople, not only will they not support any Republican candidates in November but they will also switch to the Independent or Constitutional Parties. Not wanting that to occur and understanding what all is on the line this November, on June 28th, I sent a letter to Pennsylvania Republican Party Chairman Lawrence Tabas imploring him to intervene and unify our Party.

Letter to Lawrnce Tabas

Unfortunately, as of publishing this article, to the best of my knowledge, no action has been taken. And given the communications I’ve received, it sounds like the the County GOPs intend to move forward with removing duly elected committeepeople who supported Republican candidates, merely because those candidates were not the anointed ones. These chairs seem to forget the background leading up to and purpose of the direct primary election, which was first adopted in 1842 by the Democratic Party, due to members feeling disenfranchised by the convention nomination/endorsement process and the need, for the survival of the Party, to find a process by which everyone’s voice would be heard and given equal weight. And facing identical concern in 1860, the Republican Party likewise adopted the direct primary process, with the understanding that if our members were provided a voice and equal say in the primary regarding the candidates, even if one’s particular candidate was not successful, we would all unify, as Republicans, in the general election. Unfortunately, this has been forgotten in the recent past by some in our Party and instead of allowing our members’ voices to be heard and given equal say in the primary, with us unifying in the general, some only care about their power to always have their chosen candidate on the ballot and quashing any other voices. While such works quite well in a dictatorship, it doesn’t work at all in a Republic…

While there’s still time for Chairman Tabas to intervene – and I implore him to do so – before these County GOPs pull the trigger and kill the PA Republican Party, if no action is taken to end the divisiveness and to unify our Party, while November will be bleak, it will be of no comparison as to how bad 2024 and future elections will be…

Read Part 2


Appreciate what you’re reading? Be sure to share it!

Have a story? Break it at LibertyLens.News! Become a Contributor.

To Support The Liberty Lens, Donate here.

Deconstruction of the Mind: The Fallacy of “My Truth”

Much of American culture and a majority of churches have embraced deconstructionism to the detriment of the Constitution, the country, and the Bible. Deconstructionism is a theory that eliminates truth. Such revisionists will say: “Since word meanings change, you can’t say what someone meant when they wrote text; it’s up to the reader to decide what a text means.”

Deconstructionists believe truth doesn’t matter, arguing no text can convey the same message to everyone. You hear it in Bible studies, “What this verse means to me…” NO!! “What did God mean?” is all that matters.

You get deconstructionism from Progressives, who see the Constitution as a “living document,” with no fixed or enduring meaning, subject to changing interpretations according to evolving standards or opinions. Progressives believe that, since they’re more highly evolved than the founders and framers, it’s unjust to hold them to the original meaning of the Constitution. It’s why Democrats talk so much about packing the court.

What Progressives actually want is to eliminate Judeo-Christian morality, checks and balances in government, and embrace Marxist ideas and sinful lifestyles. The Supreme Court used the evolving standards argument to legalize same-sex marriage and limit capital punishment. Whose standards evolved? God’s didn’t. They’re His laws, and the framers intended to enshrine God’s values in our laws.

Deconstructionism is contrary to the Bible’s claim that absolute truth exists, that it does not change, and that we can know it. Therefore:

  1. People have the right to be the final determiner of what they meant by what they said.
  2. Communication only occurs when the sender and the receiver have the same message. Understanding is between people, not in subjective interpretation of words.
  3. Every scriptural passage has one correct intended meaning. In order to have proper application, that original meaning must be clear.
  4. The Constitution is not a “living document” and those who disagree should not be elected to Congress and the presidency and should not be allowed on the Supreme Court. The Constitution must be interpreted by authorial intent, or originalism.

Interpreters must determine what authors meant by the words they chose. They can’t abandon what authors meant because “word meanings change” or because they don’t like what was written. This is a tactic of Marxism and, as their adage goes, the ends justify the means”.

Atheist Karl Marx didn’t believe any truth existed beyond class struggle. “Communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion, and all morality; it therefore acts in contradiction to all past historical experience. The first requisite of the happiness of the people is the abolition of religion.” That eliminates absolute truth—one of the goals of Progressivism.

The Bible, on the other hand, is the foundation for truth. As Jesus said to the Father, “Your Word is truth.” Jesus said He was THE truth. Truth means nothing apart from God. If there’s no God, there’s no truth. Truth can’t be explained or defined without God as the source. The founders and framers understood this. God is the source of all truth and rights. As St. Augustine said, “All truth is God’s truth.” There is absolute truth. It originates in the God of absolute truth, the God for whom it’s impossible to lie. Truth becomes nonsense when people attempt to remove God from their reality, the fixed source of truth.

It’s why Marxists lie so much. It is a means to achieving their atheistic dystopia. It’s worse than fake news. It’s lying propaganda. Like “2020 was the most secure election in history;” Biden saying the economy is in good shape, insurrectionists killed five cops J6 when none were killed, or the “Big Guy” saying he has no knowledge of Hunter’s business dealings. Bill Barr lied about investigating the 2020 election, and Hillary lied about the Steele dossier. The FBI offered Steele $1 million to give evidence the document was true. He couldn’t. So, the corrupt FBI used it anyway to get a FISA warrant. In 2019, the Washington Post ran an article, “Here are 18 Reasons Trump Could be a Russian Asset.” Elections are coming, so Rinos will start lying about being conservative.

Why do Marxists lie? For honorable people, ethics determine means. What the Bible, the Constitution, and the law says should direct what honorable people do. For dishonorable people, ends, not ethics, justifies means. Obama and Hillary’s hero Saul Alinsky said, “The more you care about the issue the less you should care about the methods you use to fight for it.” Their mind is corrupted. Their moral compass is broken because they abandoned God and His Word. (See Romans 1.) God said, “Those who are corrupted and do not believe, both their minds and consciences are corrupted.” Jesus said, “You belong to your father, the Devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.” Without God, there is no basis for truth.

Descartes, Kant, Hegel, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Marx, Freud, Darwin, and others have all utterly failed to account for truth and the origin of human knowledge apart from God. Truth is not “subjective” as Karl Marx claimed.

If God is not the source of truth, government determines what is truth. That ultimately leads to tyranny. Government then accuses truth-tellers of spreading conspiracy theories, disinformation, and misinformation, or of being anti-science. Then they shut down their free speech rights. Sound familiar? A court just recently ordered an end to this.

Truth is a spiritual issue for everyone. How you understand truth will shape your views on Christianity, politics, and cultural issues. Whether rejecting truth, the Bible, or the Constitution, devastating destruction follows such deconstructionism.

Denying absolute truth is a logical fallacy because those who deny it are stating an absolute truth. Ironically, saying, “There’s no absolute truth” is an absolute statement, exactly what they suggest doesn’t exist. When someone claims there’s no such thing as absolute truth, ask him, “Are you absolutely sure?” If he says, “Yes,” then he has contradicted his very premise.

Deconstructionists say all truth is relative, determined by the individual: “You have your truth; I have my truth. There’s no absolute truth for everyone.” NO!!!!!!  Again, ask, “Are you absolutely sure?” God said, “Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools.” They say the Constitution or the Bible means whatever they want it to mean—another absolute statement. The result is a subjective interpretation, limited only by the imagination. Now we’re in a quarrel. The objective answer to it is, “What did the framers mean? If it’s a biblical interpretation, the objective answer to it is, “What did God mean?” Meaning is in people, not subjective words. What did the framers mean? What did God mean? That’s all that matters.

Instead of accepting what the Bible or the Constitution actually mean, the deconstructionist arrogantly thinks he can determine the “real” or “hidden” meaning of the text. Some preachers say, “Now I know this verse doesn’t mean this, but…” BUT WHAT? His job is to tell what God says. God’s Word alone can eternally change lives; what the preacher wished the Bible said can’t do that. Interpreters are exegetes—they take out the original meaning God intended; they’re not to do eisegesis—putting in the Bible what they wish it said.

The same is true with the Constitution. Just ask, “What did the authors mean?” There can only be one answer to that question. Words have ordinary meanings, and those meanings are communicated to others.

What would happen if wills and contracts were read using deconstructionism? Contracts are interpreted in the context of their original meaning, based on the words chosen. The framers wrote a contract between “we the people” and “the states” vs. the federal government. As a contract, the Constitution lists specific processes of governing that hold the same meaning today as they did then and must tomorrow.

If interpreters ignore the framers’ intentions, the Constitution ceases to be one. This threatens our constitutional Republic. That’s tyranny. That’s deconstructionism. That’s their goal.

So, what do we do?

  1. Conservatives must love truth and boldly proclaim it. We must be intentional about our commitment to truth, which is faithfulness and submission to the God of truth. Speak truth with intense conviction. America dies in lies.
  2. Conservatives must uphold the Constitution, defending and protecting it from all enemies, foreign and domestic, including deconstructionists. And that requires becoming well-versed in it.
  3. Christians must love the Bible and boldly proclaim it. It’s absolutely crucial believers in a transcendent God and truth fully submit ourselves to the revelation God’s given us. This is not politically correct in a society that values creating our own sexual identities and “truths.”

Appreciate what you’re reading? Be sure to share it!

Have a story? Break it at LibertyLens.News! Become a Contributor.

To Support The Liberty Lens, Donate here.

OPPOSE H.R. 3557: The “Digital Prison”

0

This newly proposed federal bill is a massive federal power grab that strips away state and local control in permitting and regulatory review processes – the very mechanisms designed to protect safety of life and property from the threats posed by wireless facilities. The deployment of wireless facilities contaminates the environment with Rf/Mw radiation, a hazardous pollutant. It also facilitates the installment of the Chinese Communist Party’s model of a biometric/social credit surveillance system, threatening our sovereignty and God-given freedoms. In order to protect local control over wireless infrastructure deployment H.R. 3557 must be defeated!

Call to ACTION – Please take a few minutes to watch:

Call HR-3557 Co-Sponsors and tell them to WITHDRAW their sponsorship and OPPOSE The American Broadband Deployment Act of 2023:

  • Rep. Moran, Nathaniel [R-TX-1] (202) 225-3035
  • Rep. Dunn, Neal P. [R-FL-2] (202)-225-5235
  • Rep. Walberg, Tim [R-MI-5] (202) 225-6276
  • Rep. Crenshaw, Dan [R-TX-2] (202) 225-6565
  • Rep. Johnson, Bill [R-OH-6] (202) 225-5705
  • Rep. Bilirakis, Gus M. [R-FL-12] (202) 225-5755
  • Rep. Cammack, Kat [R-FL-3] (202) 225-5744
  • Rep. Lesko, Debbie [R-AZ-8] (202) 225-4576
  • Rep. Pence, Greg [R-IN-6] (202) 225-3021
  • Rep. Weber, Randy K., Sr. (202) 225-2831

Learn more at ACTION USA – OPPOSE H.R. 3557 • ZERO5G

You can take further action by sending an email to your representatives here: Take Action to Prevent the Next Wireless Invasion – Stop the American Broadband Deployment Act of 2023 from Being Enacted


Appreciate what you’re reading? Be sure to share it!

Have a story? Break it at LibertyLens.News! Become a Contributor.

To Support The Liberty Lens, Donate here.

Protect Pennsylvania Elections (Leah Hoopes / Greg Stenstrom)

0
We are fighting not only the left but also the Uni Party that has developed. This has been a continous battle for us to fight and protect our votes. WE NEED YOU to join us in our fight and take back our Country. WE ARE THE ONLY SURVIVING LAWSUIT IN PA!! Myself , Gregory Stenstrom and many other Patriots, have volunteered our time, risked our lives at a great cost to our reputation, our families and to our well being. We have been honored to play this role and truly feel God has his hand in this, and has led us into a battle. A spiritual battle, in which we can not cower. For months our Watchdog group investigated our County Board of Elections, their consultants and other support staff. What we found was suspect enough to dig further. Greg and I were both observers/pollwatchers in Delaware County, Pennsylvania on November 3rd  and for days following the election. Not only were we not allowed to enter a back room at the Central Counting center, where by law we were allowed to be, but also we were met with hostility, angst and unfair treatment.

It took, 3 days, an injunction and persistence to get us back into that room. After this fiasco , we continued working with the  Trump Campaign, Project Amistad and many other big names who transcribed the events and our declarations. We were asked by Senator Mastriano to be witnesses in Gettysburg and to sit on a panel in front of the Senate Committee . Rudy Giuliani, and Jenna Ellis took on this fight, except the issue was that we were never sworn in. Our statements, declarations and evidence were not submitted into a Court of law. Even still, we remained persistent and made connections . We have been on multiple news media stations including Steve Bannon’s War room, NewsMax, Lou Dobbs, Hannity and local radio shows such as Don Beishl in Philadelphia.  Pleading to many lawyers to take our case, they told us they were afraid of being disbarred and harrassed.  Greg and I  have been harrassed by the Attorney General Josh Shapiro’s agents, and I was visited by the FBI secondary to false reports. Exhausting all avenues including speaking to US Attorney William McSwain, writing and informing the District Attorney’s office and Attorney General Shapiro.

NOBODY WOULD HELP!

We finally were put into the path of our wonderful attorney Deborah Frankle Silver, a God loving , passionate , warrior who has become a trusted friend. Through fundraising we were able to retain her and get her legal fees paid. We filed our petition in the Delaware County Court of Common pleas. During this time we were graciously provided with 2 Ex FBI agents now private investigators to assist us in discovery . They interviewed judges of elections, minority inspectors, and plenty of witnesses.  They were met with vile and aggressive behavior when attempting to interview any Board of Elections workers. This case comprises of a fraud examiner, data forensic scientist, fraud specialists, a whistleblower, witnesses and many Americans who have assisted us with this case, we have a mountain of evidence, but have been denied to be heard. 

Our case was not only thrown out, but an evidentiary hearing was denied, AND NO DAY IN COURT. The Judge ( Republican mind you) excoriated us in his opinion , saying our lawyer had unclean hands, her actions were contemptbile and we did not have a scintila of evidence. He opened the flood gates as well for the defendant to seek sanctions. The Delaware County Board of Elections solicitor filed asking from us for $19,224.56 for their legal fees. This is what they call a SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public paritcipation) suit, this is nothing more than an infringement of our 1st Amendemnt right to file a petition and intimidation. Our fearless and wonderful lawyer is still in the fight. We have all been praying for direction and for us to have our day in Court. We are regular working class people with families of our own, who did their civic duty and want people to be held accountable for breaking the law. This case was appealed in the Commonwealth Court , sanctions dropped, we were recognized as intervenors, and they agreed with lower court , so we appealed to the PA SUPREME COURT , they would not take the appeal. And now we are headed to SCOTUS.

Our second case , which is a spoliation case that involves witnesses, and whistleblowers, audio and video evidence included and front loaded to the docket to Delaware County Court of Common Pleas.  WE are being sued by a public official for defamation in Philadelphia County PA, we are being targeted by everyone including the news media, the Biden Administration, DOJ, Clinton Foundation and many more….. God has intervened many times, has led us through some very difficult times. Our businesses have suffered tremendously , we have spent countless days and hours away from our family and loved ones. But this is our fight and we must carry on anyway. . People from all over the State and Country have reached out to say they want to get involved or help. So now we are asking you to please get involved and help us in this fight of a lifetime. We want to leave this Earth knowing that we did not give in to the evil, that we did not give in to the cancel culture and that we will carry on together . . God bless you, and thank you for hearing our story.

Wheels for Brad

0

Brad Bennett is a 44-year old single Christian and patriot. Brad has endured loss and unspeakable hardship after his incarceration for being peacefully present on J6. Brad’s sudden loss of employment, ruined credit and ongoing health issues caused by prison conditions, have all contributed to continuing personal and financial challenges. Brad has become an entrepreneur to overcome the difficulty of being hired with criminal charges, for which he is still waiting trial. Brad is facing a transportation crisis, as his 2008 vehicle is no longer serviceable. Would you help this brave patriot by contributing to a reliable, used vehicle that he can use to make a living?

About Brad: Brad served on the mission field for about fifteen years, visiting 18 nations to serve the poor and share his faith. Out of love and concern for America, he traveled to Washington DC on Jan. 6, 2021 along with many other Americans, to peacefully assemble at the nation’s capital, with the sole purpose of praying and interceding for our nation. Months later, this resulted in unexpectedly being taken into custody and serving 2 months in prison followed by 3 months on house arrest with an ankle monitor. He is unable to travel outside a restricted area in NC, although he has not been tried, limiting both ministry and work opportunities.

Please help us raise at least $16,000 for Brad to replace his vehicle with a serviceable SUV that can handle a stepladder and supplies for his car detailing business. Thank you and God bless you for your compassion and generosity!

- Advertisement -
Google search engine