Pennsylvania Elections Four Years Later: Has Anything Changed?

The 2020 election brought about one of the biggest psychologically damaging moments to our nation. It was a year during which Act77 in Pennsylvania was passed and voting rights were extended to allow mail-in voting, and congruently, fraud.  We saw across the nation how votes mysteriously jumped in the early morning hours. People went to bed expecting a Trump win and woke up to the Biden nightmare.

Every election, as far back as I can remember, where the Republicans won, the Democrats would decry foul play and contest the results.  The 2020 election was one where it was quite obvious something was wrong. We could all feel it, documentaries were made about it, and the government used the justice system to weaponize our own government against us.  Every Communist trick in the book was used to ensure the citizens could not question the outcome, including going after the politicians who followed their constituent’s request to look into it.  This is well demonstrated where on January 6^th, Congressman Scott Perry stood in the chamber and wanted some answers.  Since then, there has been a target on Perry’s back, most recently from PA Governor Josh Shapiro from the DNC floor as he cried from his DNC safe space declaring he would go after Perry 4 years later. Shapiro could use some counseling to get over it at this point.  The bigger question is “Why?”: Why did the government actively suppress the information if Biden legitimately won the election?  They have never done that before.

More concerning is that four years later, there are actually Republicans pushing the narrative of “free, safe, fair, and secure” elections without any recognition that there is 50% of the voting populace that are still disenfranchised. Pennsylvanians and former politicians, Lou Barletta and Mark Schweiker proudly put out an opinion piece in the Pennsylvania Post Gazette that they have joined the board of “RightCount,” a nonprofit that, at first glance, says is an “organization with the mission to help fortify and protect the rule of law in the tabulation of voting across the United States.”  However, it seems more like a propaganda organization that is to drive home the narrative of misinformation without actually looking at election integrity.

Who is behind RIGHTCOUNT, a Republican-led 501(c)(3) focused on reducing “the appeal of extremism for election doubters” and building “confidence in the outcome of elections”????

Let’s find out…🧵/ pic.twitter.com/c9HV2VvQ5A

— Jessica Wood (@Woodshed2012) September 28, 2024

What is telling is the wording. For example, from their article, it states that “misinformation destroys confidence in elections and represents a critical threat to public safety.”  This language is directly from the Brennan Center which is a Soros funded election integrity organization, just on the other side of the aisle.  I guess we are going to ignore the millions of marginalized voters who have been asking for audits, with evidence, for years with some of them getting sued over it.  The other thing that jumps out is, currently, free speech figureheads like the head of Telegram are being arrested in the name of “misinformation.”  The UK is arresting people who they deem have misguided memes or ones that are offensive.  Are these guys looking to uproot our first amendment so that free speech is taken away … this is a question for the liberals and RINO Republicans alike.

Next, in the opinion piece is the idea that “the strength of our democracy depends on the confidence that every eligible voter has a voice and that every vote is counted accurately” and continues on with, “it’s time we bring down the temperature, cut through false rhetoric and highlight the ongoing efforts and successes in maintaining the integrity of Pennsylvania’s election system.” I am just curious: “What changes have been made in Pennsylvania since the 2020 election to correct the fraud issue?”.  It seems these two and their organizations are great at talking, but the action falls short – to like… none. In Pennsylvania, we have had no changes to the machines that we know do have access to the internet (there are screenshots of their Bluetooth connections), we have not seen widespread voter roll clean ups, and our governor has used the driver’s license system to give illegal immigrants access to voting rights (registering them during the process of getting a driver’s license). So, while these two say they want integrity, first, it would need to be restored. And neither seem to have an interest in that.  And while they say they want to continuously improve the system, wouldn’t that require changes along the way?  Dear Schweiker and Barletta: We have no voter confidence in Pennsylvania. It is the same “SURE” system that has been in place where most of us are quite unsure.  As they want to declare that the commonwealth has measures to ensure the election process is secure and safe for voter registration and certification of results, in actuality, the DOS (Department of State) has done nothing here.  Each county has their own rules and approaches to implementing confusing and unlawful direction. And yet continues to remain in place to this day.

Another argument cited says that every first-time voter must show an ID.  However, with the mail-in voters, this is patently false. Counties are required to verify, however, if there is a lack of information, the DOS’s official statement is they have to register.  This is a misinterpretation of federal election law.  Identification should be required every time a person votes.  We need it to buy alcohol, Sudafed, and for nearly every aspect of life at this point. Why are we avoiding it for one of the most important rights as a United States citizen?  Another blatant lie says that Pennsylvania collaborates with other states to reduce duplicate registrations. In some counties, they have 90% voter registration of their entire population.  This is statistically impossible. Are we registering babies in this process? It gets worse: This number is after the state was sued by Judicial Watch and Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) to remove deceased and unqualified people from the rolls.

And while they say that the drop boxes are under constant surveillance, there is no statutory requirement for this and the drop boxes themselves are a creation of the courts. When citizens have tried to monitor these drop boxes, they have been falsely accused of criminal activity and harassment.

Schweiker and Barletta also claim accuracy is at the forefront of our elections as they push their narrative.  There are a couple of audits that happen. First, machines are checked for accuracy of ballot information delivered (which isn’t much of an audit unless not connected to internet and a hand count from both parties are held). The county board of elections does pull a 2% random sample of 2000 ballots for a recount, but this is really just another limiting audit, so “audit” is a stretch. This is really a statistical tool that measures accuracy similar to ballot accuracy check.  These two gentlemen, actually believe these measures would catch and correct discrepancies. The measures may catch something, but the correction activity is unclear since it’s only a measure of accuracy. There is no requirement of action if discrepancies are found as we saw in the 2020 election. There is no reconciliation before the certification. And without a reconciliation, there is no audit.

These politicians state that there is collaboration between state and local officials. However, as a person who attended the House State Government Committee Hearings, this directly contradicts the statements given.

Moreso, there is a lack of recognition of true issues like our government issuing 628,000 non-citizen PennDOT licenses and IDs that allow non-citizens to go on the voter rolls. No action has been taken to ensure this is not happening.

These guys can yell from the roof tops about the effort to spread misinformation. However, the misinformation is coming from them.  There has been a concerted effort by government and other activist groups like “RightCount” and “Democracy Defense Project” to silence, marginalize, and gaslight voters into the “fair, safe, and secure” storyline.  I have been at the polls when Republican ballots ran out and people lost their opportunity to vote, saw when Northampton, PA lost election night USB sticks, and am aware of the inflated voter rolls. It is more like an abusive relationship where the spouse is beaten into submission . . .and now we have Republicans actually doing the abuse.

As the populace, we have to wake up, put the Democrats and the RINO Republicans in their safe spaces, and not continue the Biden nightmare with a fraudulent Harris win.

Appreciate what you’re reading? Be sure to share it!

Have a story? Break it at LibertyLens.News! Become a Contributor.

Support platforms, like The Liberty Lens, that enable independent grassroots journalism. Donate here.