Attack on Science: Lancet Stifles Peer-Review

On the heels of overwhelming interest in research that examined the connection between autopsy results and COVID vaccines, The Lancet has made a chilling decision to pull the study from its pre-print server. The paper was written by cardiologist, Dr. Peter McCullough, epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch, and others at The Wellness Company. Both are extensively published and cited, and renowned in their respective fields. “Pre-print” is a stage of publication where a paper is submitted for peer review, so in taking this action, The Lancet effectively prevented the study from even being subjected to peer review. The implications of this are far-reaching. If the peer-review process can be prevented, McCullough warned that there can actually be “a misleading of the scientific community”.

The study consisted of 325 autopsies, and found that 240 deaths – almost 74% – were found to be either a direct or indirect result of the COVID vaccine. For those who have been alleging causation and not just correlation, this study appears to provide the smoking gun.

As a justification for its decision, The Lancet asserted that “the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology”. In response to the assertion, Dr. McCullough was quick to point out, “they had two chances to make that determination before they accepted it”, and further that “it is standard methodology”. When asked if any further detail was provided by The Lancet about what was lacking in the methodology, Dr. McCullough said directly, “No”. He went on to suggest that this may well be referred to “Lancet-gate 2”. Lancet-gate 1 alludes to a previous paper at The Lancet on Hydroxychloroquine that was later found to be “fraudulent”.

As it has turned out, Dr. McCullough says the “Lancet’s intentional censorship of the scientific truth” is having quite a boomerang effect with much greater exposure in the mainstream than it ever would have received, had the Lancet just published the paper. Other journals are reaching out with interest in the study, and he has had extensive opportunity to discuss the findings in the public square.

“…The next person we see [who died with] no explanation for the death, we have to ask the question, ‘did they take the vaccine?’. …If they took the vaccine – at any time – we know that, more likely than not, that the vaccine is the cause of death… That’s the implication of our paper.”

The study is now available for viewing at the Zenodo pre-print server, and under review at another high-level journal.

Appreciate what you’re reading? Be sure to share it!

Have a story? Break it at LibertyLens.News! Become a Contributor.

To Support The Liberty Lens, Donate here.